Approval of Remedies for Contaminated Sites

 

Depending upon the environmental characteristics presented by a contaminated site, the site may fall under the requirements of one or more local, state and federal agencies with responsibilities for environmental protection.  Once conditions at a site have been identified as a potential threat to public health and the environment, various means and programs exist to address such problems, and the statutory responsibilities of the various local, state and federal agencies come into play.  Community Involvement is an integral part of this process.

 

California law does not specify that any one agency has jurisdiction over hazardous substances release sites.  Who has jurisdiction and who gets involved has to do with the site-specific conditions (For example, does the site pose a threat to water quality?  Do hazardous substances at the site threaten public health or the environment?) and which agency has the most information about the site.

 

While California law specifies that Regional Water Quality Control Boards and the Department of Toxic Substances Control have authority over hazardous substance releases, other agencies retain their jurisdiction and administer their applicable administrative and operational requirements. 

 

Cleanup Process for Contaminated Sites

In general, the process to clean up a contaminated site involves discovery, investigation and cleanup of properties where uncontrolled releases of hazardous substances have occurred.  Thousands of properties throughout the State,  including former industrial plants, military bases, small businesses and landfills,  are contaminated with some level of toxic substances.  Currently, work is underway on hundreds of contaminated properties throughout the State.

 

While each agency may use different terminology, the cleanup of contaminated sites generally consists of the following steps:

 

1.  Preliminary Endangerment Assessment (Discovery)

The PEA generally consists of a Phase I Environmental Assessment, a Phase II Endangerment Assessment and a risk analysis.  PEAs are performed to determine if current or past hazardous substance or hazardous waste management practices at the site have resulted in a release or threatened release posing a threat to public health or the environment. 

 

The PEA requires sampling and analysis to determine the extent of contamination and a preliminary evaluation of the risks.  A more in depth evaluation of the property is conducted if contamination is found, including the taking of samples and conducting a preliminary risk assessment.  The process ends here if contamination is not found, or if found, and is not considered to pose a significant risk.

 

2.  Remedial Investigation and Feasibility Study (Investigation)

This is a full-fledged evaluation of the property to determine what hazardous substances are present, the level of contamination and risk, and the lateral and vertical extent of contamination.  A site specific risk assessment is conducted in this step.  During the later stages of the Remedial Investigation, a Feasibility Study is conducted to determine the best available options to consider for cleaning up the property.

 

3.  Removal Action Workplan (RAW) Process (Cleanup)

The Removal Action Workplan or RAW is the remedy selection document for the site, if the cost of cleanup is less than $1 million.  A RAW can be conducted after the PEA or after the RI/FS depending on conditions at the site.  The RAW can be the final remedy for the site in which case the site proceeds to certification (#7).  If operation and maintenance is needed, an Operation and Maintenance Plan and Agreement/Order are put in place.  If deed restrictions are needed, they are recorded on the property. 

 

4.  Remedial Action Plan (RAP) Process 

If the cleanup costs are greater than $1 million, a Remedial Action Plan (RAP) is developed as the remedy selection document.  This plan discusses the findings of the Remedial Investigation and the options identified in the Feasibility Study.  The administering agency’s preferred option is included in the Remedial Action Plan. 

 

5.  Remedial Design

Once the Remedial Action Plan is adopted, a remedial design for the cleanup project is prepared.  This is a full-blown engineering design for the cleanup together with any long-term systems that may be needed.  Additionally, other documents needed to implement the remedy (for example, health & safety plans and transportation plans) are also developed as a part of the remedial design documents.

 

6.  Remedial Action 

This is the implementation of the Remedial Action Plan and Remedial Design, the actual site cleanup process.

 

7.  Site Certification 

If the site activity is overseen by either a RWQCB or DTSC, upon successful completion of the remedial action, a site is certified by that agency as having been adequately addressed.  This process provides “closure” for the parties who have conducted the cleanup and makes the property available for new land uses.  In those instances where cleanup must be conducted over a number of years after completion of the remedial action, (such as a site with extensive groundwater contamination), a site is not certified until the agency has determined that all systems are functioning as designed. 

 

Operation & Maintenance Plans and Agreements/Orders must be in place along with appropriate deed restrictions prior to certification.  Once certified, these kinds of sites are placed on a special list where they are evaluated periodically to determine whether long term cleanup or containment systems are functioning as designed and are meeting the cleanup goals specified in the Remedial Action Plan.

 

 

Community Notification/Information

 

Several federal and state environmental regulations require public participation during the site cleanup process, permitting approval process and corrective action process.  The Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) complies with the public participation requirements of the Comprehensive Environmental Responsibility, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act, National Contingency Plan, Health and Safety Code, and the California Environmental Quality Act.  Different levels of public participation are required at different stages of the cleanup process.

 

DTSC establishes a local information repository near the site before a remedial investigation begins or before initiating any remedial action at a site.  Usually, information repositories are established at local libraries near the site.  Project files that contain key documents on site related remedial activities are placed in the information repositories.  These key documents include the preliminary endangerment assessment, site investigation, remedial investigation/feasibility study, removal and remedial action documents, public participation plan, administrative record and other relevant information. 

 

In addition to the local information repositories, the project file is also available for public review at DTSC and RWQCB offices (if the RWQCB is involved in oversight).  Air permit information may also be available from the local air pollution control or air quality management district for the vapor treatment units.  These documents, and others, can be accessed and copied by submitting a request under the California Public Records Act (California Government Code Section 6250, et seq., also known as Government Code, Title 1, Section 7, Chapter 3.5)

 

Furthermore, in compliance with SB 47 (Chapter 23, Stats. 1999 or Health & Safety Code Chapter 6.8), based upon community survey, DTSC provides opportunity for public involvement (public meeting/public comments) at key stages of the response action process.  Key stages include the health risk assessment, preliminary assessment, site inspection, remedial investigation and feasibility study.  If DTSC determines that public meetings or comment is not appropriate at these stages, then DTSC sends notice of the decision to the affected community. 

 

Community members are encouraged to participate in each stage of the decision making process.  Questions for Community Use are provided on this web to help community members define potential issues and concerns regarding a specific SVE project.  The information contained in this web site should be used in conjunction with the site specific fact sheet and related documents provided by the regulatory agencies when participating in the decision making process.  For further information on State environmental regulatory agencies go to the Cal/EPA Home Page.

 

(End of section. Use your browser “back” button to go back.)